A lot of media attention has been given to the announcement of Google's Android and this site is no different, but I figured I should a post comparing and contrasting OpenMoko and Android. Off the bat, you might have noticed that I appended a little version 0.1 to the title of this post. This is mainly because a lot of what I am writing if going off pure speculation related to the facts that the public and the media know. I have read a lot of posts on other blogs comparing the two, and anyone searching "OpenMoko Android" on Google blog search can check it out other opinions for themselves. Ironic using Google to search for these opinions...
Anyway my first take is that Google is truly committed on hopping on the open source bandwagon, if not for publicity more than anything. One can see with the recent announcement of OpenSocial and Android, that the approach Google is taking to the future of software is open source applications will lead to innovation, community involvement, and cross platform integration.
Almost every major Web 2.0 company (Digg, Facebook, Google) has taken this approach with release of open source APIs, and it seems open source is one of the biggest buzzwords currently, replacing blog or Web 2.0, but how does all this relate to the open source phone market?
I am predicting a new buzzword "Mobile 2.0" will start to make its rounds as new open source software stacks start to proliferate the market place. Even though OpenMoko or Android are not the first, they seems to be getting the most hype. The difference in between the OpenMoko and Android is the financial interests of not only Google, but the other 30 major mobile technology companies that have already signed on to back Android in the near future.
Google will make money with the project no matter what, since they are preaching a phone that integrates well with the internet and with their services.This is a godsend to many people, including myself, because Google is integrated deeply into our everyday lives. It must be noted that the more we use Google and it's services on the internet, the more money they will make. Such is not the case with the OpenMoko, due to the complete independence of the entire project from big-telecommunications.
It is the idea of carrier customized Android that comes bundled with a phone when purchased that separates it from OpenMoko. Since it is open source, a partner company could lock it down to the current mobile situation and it's in their financial interest to do so. Completely losing revenue on ringtones alone would be enough to justify that. Can anyone argue that the iPhone cannot use your library as ringtones due to anything but carrier limitations and profit potential for sales?
With the OpenMoko we will not have to worry about issues like these. If a software feature is wanted or needed, it will only be a matter of time before someone ends up taking the project into their own hands. An example of community ingenuity with the closed source iPhone, with hackers working on it since the day of release to unlock it and install their own software.
In terms of information collecting, what better platform to get information on people than on their mobile phone. It is the one device that over 3 billion people take with them everywhere, and depend on for entertainment, communication, and productivity. I am not spouting crackpot big brother theories, but if you think about it this seems extremely viable to a company where context advertising is based on each user it makes perfect sense.
you may have recently text messaged a friend mentioning a desire to see a new movie, than while checking your Gmail on Android, you notice on a banner that the movie is playing at 7:00pm and 10:00pm at a local theater. This could bring context sensitive ads to the next level. Again with OpenMoko you really don't have to worry about corporations watching your habbits to learn more about you an effectively market towards you. I am not saying this will be the case with Android, but most of Google's other services use things like this to justify their cost of development since they are offered for free to the consumer.
One thing that cannot be argued is that Android may really become the vehicle that changes the big-telecommunications closed world into something more accessible for everyone in the future. OpenMoko has achieved a somewhat cult following like most Linux products, most of it due to the media's coverage of the first totally open phone. Google's announcement still hasn't made waves near as big as the iPhone since they did not show a shiny new OS specific phone, but I think that the attention will come as the first phones start shipping with it installed.
I am excited to try out the product, and cannot wait to see all the innovations that google will include. For my true open source mobile experiance, I haven't seen or heard anything that makes Android anything near an OpenMoko killer, but rather something that helps further the truly open source ideals that the OpenMoko team was founded upon.